Juulis esitas advokaat Paul Keres siseministeeriumile taotluse alustada järelevalvet kaitsepolitsei üle. Ta arvab, et kapo ei teavita piisavalt inimesi, kelle kõnesid on pealt kuulatud.
Siseministeerium vastas, et järelevalve alustamine pole vajalik. Nad ütlesid, et
privaatsust ei rikutud oluliselt
ja järelevalve segaks Pari Pruunsilla
kohtuasja
, kes on Kerese klient.
privaatsust ei rikutud oluliselt
Tõlge fraasile: privaatsust ei rikutud oluliselt
EN
privacy was not significantly violated
kohtuasja
Tõlge fraasile: kohtuasja
EN
court case
Keres ei nõustu ministeeriumi selgitustega. Ta ütles, et
probleem puudutab rohkem inimesi
kui tema klienti ja et ministeeriumi seletus oli vale.
probleem puudutab rohkem inimesi
Tõlge fraasile: probleem puudutab rohkem inimesi
EN
the problem affects more people
Siseminister Igor Taro arvab, et Keres üritab oma kliendi kohtuprotsessi mõjutada. Taro ütles, et praegu peab menetleja ise hindama, kas rikkumine oli oluline.
Taro rääkis, et järelevalveid ei saa alustada ühe inimese põhjendamatul taotlusel. Ta soovitas advokaadil oma kliendi kaitsmiseks kasutada kohtusüsteemi.
Endine siseminister Ain Seppik ja advokaat Carri Ginter ei nõustu ministeeriumi selgitustega. Nad arvavad, et järelevalve alustamine oleks õige.
Seppik ütles, et ministeerium ei ole rikkumiste ulatust kontrollinud. Ta lisas, et järelevalve on
ministri kohustus
ja antud juhul jäi see täitmata.
ministri kohustus
Tõlge fraasile: ministri kohustus
EN
minister's duty
Advokaat Carri Ginter ei usu, et
mitteteavitamine
peaks olema tavapärane. Ta ütles, et
probleem on suurem
kui vaid kapo tegevus. Ginter kritisceris siseministeeriumi, et nad ei ole rikkumiste olulisust piisavalt hinnanud.
mitteteavitamine
Tõlge fraasile: mitteteavitamine
EN
failure to inform
probleem on suurem
Tõlge fraasile: probleem on suurem
EN
the problem is bigger
In July, lawyer Paul Keres submitted a request to the Ministry of the Interior to initiate oversight over the Security Police. He believes that Kapo does not sufficiently inform people whose conversations have been eavesdropped on.
The Ministry of the Interior responded that initiating oversight is not necessary. They stated that privacy was not significantly violated and that oversight would interfere with the court case of Pari Pruunsill, who is Keres's client.
Keres disagrees with the ministry's explanations. He said that the problem affects more people than just his client and that the ministry's explanation was incorrect.
Interior Minister Igor Taro believes that Keres is trying to influence his client's court proceedings. Taro said that currently, the processor must assess whether the violation was significant.
Taro stated that oversight cannot be initiated based on one person's unjustified request. He advised the lawyer to use the court system to defend his client.
Former Interior Minister Ain Seppik and lawyer Carri Ginter disagree with the ministry's explanations. They believe that initiating oversight would be the right thing to do.
Seppik said that the ministry has not assessed the extent of the violations. He added that oversight is the minister's obligation and in this case, it was not fulfilled.
Lawyer Carri Ginter does not believe that non-notification should be the norm. He said that the problem is bigger than just Kapo's actions. Ginter criticized the Ministry of the Interior for not sufficiently assessing the significance of the violations.