Herem: rahuajal oleks droonirünnakuid raske tõrjuda

Herem: rahuajal oleks droonirünnakuid raske tõrjuda

EN

Herem: Drone attacks would be difficult to repel during peacetime

Martin Herem ütles, et oleks väga keeruline. Selleks oleks vaja palju inimesi ja raha. Ta arvab, et piiri ääres peaks olema 24 tundi päevas . Need üksused peaksid koosnema .
EN

Martin Herem said that repelling drone attacks during peacetime would be very difficult. It would require many people and money. He believes that there should be 24-hour air defense units at the border. These units should consist of reservists.

Herem rääkis, et drooni tõrjumine oleks ka . Droonid ja radari abil neid ei pruugi näha. Reageerimisaeg oleks väga lühike. Ukraina kogemus näitab, et drooni kuuleb umbes 15 sekundit enne, kui ta kohale jõuab.
EN

Herem explained that repelling drones would also be technically challenging. Drones fly low and may not be visible on radar. The reaction time would be very short. Experience from Ukraine shows that a drone can be heard about 15 seconds before it arrives.

Sõja ajal oleks olukord teine. Siis oleks piir täis radareid ja relvi. Herem mainis, et Eestil on juba palju . Näiteks on hea õhutõrjerelv. Meil on ka kahureid ja rakette.
EN

During wartime, the situation would be different. Then the border would be full of radars and weapons. Herem mentioned that Estonia already has many air defense weapons. For example, the CV90 armored vehicle is a good air defense weapon. We also have cannons and missiles.

Aga on raske leida lahendust. Herem ütles, et pidevalt oleks liiga kallis. Kasu oleks vähe. Ta arvab, et praegu ei ole vaja karta .
EN

But in peacetime, finding a solution is difficult. Herem said that maintaining constant surveillance at the border would be too expensive. The benefit would be minimal. He believes there is currently no need to fear an attack from Russia.

Herem pakkus välja erinevaid põhjuseid, miks droon Auvere jaama korstnale lendas. Võimalik, et see oli Ukraina droon, mis eksis. Või venelased kasutasid seda provokatsiooniks. Herem usub, et droonil oli . Kuid täpselt ei tea, kes drooni saatis. Selle uurib nüüd .
EN

Herem suggested various reasons why the drone flew to the chimney of the Auvere power plant. It might have been a Ukrainian drone that got lost. Or the Russians used it as a provocation. Herem believes the drone carried explosives. However, it is not exactly known who sent the drone. The defense police are now investigating this.