Raport: Eesti tervishoid vajab otsust, kas panna rõhk riigi või erarahale

Raport: Eesti tervishoid vajab otsust, kas panna rõhk riigi või erarahale

EN

Report: Estonia's healthcare needs a decision on whether to focus on state or private funding

tugineb solidaarsele ravikindlustusele. Kaks kolmandikku tervishoiu tuludest on töötavate inimeste makstav . Tervishoiudkulud on kasvanud kolm korda suuremaks võrreldes 2010. aastaga, sest teenused on kallinenud.
EN

Estonia's healthcare system is based on solidarity-based health insurance. Two-thirds of healthcare revenues come from the social tax paid by working people. Healthcare costs have tripled compared to 2010 because services have become more expensive.

Kolmapäeval tutvustatud raportis võeti arvesse, et kaitsekulud püsivad kõrged ja uusi raha tervishoidu ei saa. Võtmetähtsusega on – terved maksavad haigete eest, noored eakate eest. Raport pakub kolme võimalikku stsenaariumit kuni 2035. aastani.
EN

The report presented on Wednesday took into account that defense costs remain high and no new money can be allocated to healthcare. The principle of solidarity is key – the healthy pay for the sick, the young for the elderly. The report offers three possible scenarios up to 2035.

Esimeses stsenaariumis "Digilootus" panustatakse tugevalt digilahendustesse ja tervisetehnoloogiatesse. See algab 200 miljoni eurose investeeringuga le, et võita aega teiste meetmete jõustumiseks. Haiglate ja perearstide infosüsteemid ühendatakse ning luuakse AI-otsustustood ja automaatne dokumenteerimine.
EN

The first scenario "Digital Hope" strongly invests in digital solutions and health technologies. It begins with a €200 million investment in the Health Insurance Fund to buy time for other measures to take effect. Hospital and family doctor information systems will be integrated, and AI decision-making tools and automatic documentation will be created.

Teine stsenaarium "Turutervishoid" suurendab e rolli. Inimeste omaosalus kasvab, aga kulud vähenevad. Esialgu toob see süsteemi lisaraha, kuid ilma riigi panuse kasvuta nõrgeneb avalik tervishoid. Kvaliteedi- ja ligipääsuerinevused elanikkonnagruppide vahel kasvavad.
EN

The second scenario "Market Healthcare" increases the role of private insurance. People's own contributions increase, but the Health Insurance Fund's costs decrease. Initially, this brings additional money into the system, but without an increase in state contributions, public healthcare weakens. Quality and access disparities between population groups grow.

Kolmas stsenaarium "Liiga vähe ja liiga hilja" on kõige halvem. Riik ootab ja loodab, et olukord paraneb ise. Rahastamine püsib praeguse tulubaasi juures, kuid reservid kahanevad. Teenuste kvaliteet ja kättesaadavus langevad järsult.
EN

The third scenario "Too Little, Too Late" is the worst. The state waits and hopes the situation will improve on its own. Funding remains at the current revenue base, but reserves dwindle. The quality and availability of services decline sharply.

Kõigi kolme stsenaariumi võtmeküsimus on, kui tugev peab olema . Vaja on otsustada, kas laiendada maksubaasi või suurendada e rolli. Digilahendustele panustamise mõju on raske prognoosida.
EN

The key question for all three scenarios is how strong the solidarity principle should be. A decision must be made whether to expand the tax base or increase the role of private insurance. The impact of investing in digital solutions is difficult to predict.

Raportis pakutakse nelja võimalikku lahendusteed: uued tervisemaksud, e laiendamine, digilahendustele panustamine või . Digilahendustele panustamine võib tuua pikaajaliselt suuri säästusid, kuid nõuab suuri investeeringuid.
EN

The report suggests four possible solution paths: new health taxes, expansion of private insurance, investment in digital solutions, or value-based healthcare models. Investing in digital solutions may bring significant long-term savings but requires large investments.

Tervishoiukulude kasvu peapõhjused on ja teenuste kasvanud kasutamine. Palgatõus on tunduvalt vähendanud . Rahvastiku vananemine ja teenuste kasutamine on samuti kulude kasvu põhjuseks.
EN

The main reasons for the growth in healthcare costs are rising medical salaries and increased use of services. Salary increases have significantly reduced the emigration of healthcare workers. Population aging and service utilization are also reasons for cost growth.

Eestis moodustavad tervishoiukulud 7,5 protsenti SKP-st, Euroopa keskmine on 10,2 protsenti. Kui Eesti tervishoiu rahastamine oleks EL-i keskmisel tasemel, oleks Eestis igal aastal ligikaudu miljard eurot enam. Tervishoiukulude kasv on viinud selleni, et kulud ületavad tulusid igal aastal kuni 100 miljoni euro võrra.
EN

In Estonia, healthcare costs account for 7.5% of GDP, while the European average is 10.2%. If Estonia's healthcare funding were at the EU average level, Estonia would have approximately one billion euros more each year. The growth in healthcare costs has led to expenses exceeding revenues by up to €100 million annually.

Erakindlustus Eestis katab juba ligikaudu kümnendikku töötajaid. Enim kasutavad t 25-39-aastased kõrgharitud hea tervisega inimesed.
EN

Private insurance in Estonia already covers about one-tenth of employees. The most frequent users of private insurance are highly educated people aged 25-39 in good health.