Erik Moora wrote a commentary. The commentary talked about corruption. Parvel Pruunsild was not satisfied. Pruunsild wanted Moora to retract his words. The court did not agree with Pruunsild.
The court stated that Moora's commentary was general in nature. The court found that Pruunsild has access to the leaders of Isamaa. The court stated that this could be considered a benefit. The court found that Pruunsild did not demand anything from Isamaa in exchange for donations.
The court left the complaint unaddressed. The decision can be appealed within 30 days.