Madise: 2000 juhul on pangakonto väljavõte tehtud ilma seaduslikku luba

Madise: 2000 juhul on pangakonto väljavõte tehtud ilma seaduslikku luba

EN

Madise: In 2000 cases, bank account statements were obtained without legal permission

sai ligi tele. See ei olnud seadusega lubatud. Sellisel viisil tehti seda umbes 2000 korral.
Õiguskantslerile tuli kaebus. Kaebus ütles, et mõned saavad ligi pangakonto andmetele. Näiteks saavad nad teada, millised . Aga seadus ei anna neile selleks õigust.
Seadus lubab rahapesu andmebürool saada ainult väheseid andmeid. Näiteks kas või millal see avati. Aga konto väljavõtteid saada ei tohi.
Küsimus on ka selles, kas asutused . Seda veel täpselt ei teata. Kuid teada on, et 2000 korral võeti väljavõte ilma seadusliku õiguseta.
Miks sellised asjad Eestis juhtuvad? Seadus ütleb, et andmeid võib koguda. Aga pole selge, kes seda teha võib. Pole ka selge, millistel põhjustel.
Õiguskantsler arvab, et probleem on tegematajätmises. Ministrid ja riigikogu ei ole piisavalt täpsed seadustes.
Praegu on olukord, kus andmeid kogutakse palju. See toimub nii ärides kui ka riigis. Tehnoloogia areneb kiiresti. Seetõttu on vaja arutada, kuidas andmeid kasutada.
Oluline on . Ühelt poolt peab kasutama tehnoloogiat. Teiselt poolt tuleb . Seda tuleb arutada avalikult ja teha .
Praegu on mõned olulised reeglid seadustes kirja pandamata. See ei ole väike probleem. See on väga tähtis küsimus – kas .
The Money Laundering Data Bureau gained access to bank account statements. This was not permitted by law. This was done in approximately 2000 cases.
A complaint was filed with the Chancellor of Justice. The complaint stated that some government agencies have access to bank account data. For example, they can find out what transactions have been made. But the law does not give them the right to do so.
The law allows the Money Laundering Data Bureau to obtain only limited data. For example, whether an account exists or when it was opened. But account statements must not be obtained.
The question is also whether the agencies used the data correctly. This is not yet known precisely. However, it is known that in 2000 cases, statements were obtained without legal permission.
Why do such things happen in Estonia? The law says that data can be collected. But it is not clear who can do it. It is also not clear on what grounds.
The Chancellor of Justice believes that the problem lies in omission. Ministers and the parliament are not precise enough in the laws.
Currently, there is a situation where a lot of data is being collected. This happens both in businesses and in the state. Technology is developing rapidly. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss how to use data.
It is important to find a balance. On one hand, technology must be used. On the other hand, people's rights must be protected. This must be discussed publicly and clear laws must be made.
Currently, some important rules are not written into the laws. This is not a small problem. This is a very important question – whether officials are acting correctly.