23. märts 2026

Hussar: soovitasin ametnikku mitte vallandada

Hussar: I advised not to dismiss the official

Lauri Hussar ütleb, et riigikogu juhatus ei mõjutanud i otsust vallandada ametnikku. Küll aga soovitas Hussar, et staažikat nõunikku ei peaks vallandama.

Kas arutas ametniku probleemi? Ei, ei arutanud seda teemat. Sellised asjad ei kuulu päevakorda.

Kas poliitikud survestasid kantseleijuhti? Ei, tegi otsuse ise. Riigikogu juhatus ei sega kantselei töösse. Seadus ei luba seda.

Kas ja on seotud? Hussar ütleb, et ametnik ei täitnud oma kohustusi. Kantselei direktor tegi otsuse juurdluse põhjendusel.

Kas poliitikute allkirjade kogumine on õige? Hussar ei tea, kellele need allkirjad on mõeldud. Kui need on kantseleile, siis see võib olla .

Kas opositsioon teeb seda poliitika mänguna? Hussar arvab, et allkirjade kogumine võib kahjustada kantselei tööd. See ei ole hea tava.

Kas riigikogu juhatus saab ametniku tagasi võtta? Ei, juhatus ei sega kantselei sse. Kui liikmed tahavad, võivad nad kirjutada kantseleile.

Kas i otsus kahjustas t? Hussar arvab, et nii otsus kui ka sellele järgnenud arutelu kahjustasid mainet. Kantselei direktor peaks oma otsust põhjendama.

Miks ei räägi avalikult? Hussar ütleb, et direktor peaks oma otsuseid selgitama. See aitab hoida t.

Miks Hussar soovitas ametnikku mitte vallandada? Ta arvas, et see juhtum ei vajanud nii palju tähelepanu. Otsus oli i oma. Juhatus ei sekkunud, vaid andis soovitusi.

Kas soovitamine on sekkumine? Ei, Hussar ütleb, et nad ainult soovitasid. Kantselei direktor tegi otsuse ise. Ta oli vaba ja keegi ei survetanud teda.

Speaker of the Riigikogu Lauri Hussar says that the board of the Riigikogu did not influence the decision of the chancellery director to dismiss an official. However, Hussar advised that the experienced advisor should not be dismissed.

Did the Council of Elders discuss the official's problem? No, the Council of Elders did not discuss this topic. Such matters do not belong on the agenda of the Council of Elders.

Did politicians pressure the chancellery head? No, the chancellery director made the decision independently. The Riigikogu board does not interfere in the work of the chancellery. The law does not allow it.

Is the flaw in the Gambling Act and the dismissal of the official related? Hussar says that the official did not fulfill their duties. The chancellery director made the decision based on an investigation.

Is the collection of politicians' signatures appropriate? Hussar does not know who the signatures are intended for. If they are for the chancellery, it could be political interference.

Is the opposition doing this as a political game? Hussar believes that collecting signatures could harm the work of the chancellery. This is not a good practice.

Can the Riigikogu board reinstate the official? No, the board does not interfere in the chancellery's personnel policy. If members wish, they can write to the chancellery.

Did the chancellery director's decision damage the reputation of the Riigikogu? Hussar believes that both the decision and the subsequent discussion damaged the reputation. The chancellery director should justify their decision.

Why doesn't the chancellery director speak publicly? Hussar says that the director should explain their decisions. This helps maintain the reputation of the Riigikogu.

Why did Hussar advise not to dismiss the official? He thought this case did not require so much attention. The decision was the chancellery director's own. The board did not interfere but gave advice.

Is giving advice interference? No, Hussar says they only advised. The chancellery director made the decision independently. They were free, and no one pressured them.