Estonia teatri juurdeehitus

Estonia teatri juurdeehitus

EN

Extension of the Estonia Theatre

Tallinna keeldus Estonia teatri . Kuid see ei tähenda, et juurdeehitus on alati võimatu. ERR sai teada Tallinna õigusteenistuse memo järgi.
EN

The Tallinn City Planning Department refused to approve the extension of the Estonia Theatre. However, this does not mean that the extension is always impossible. ERR learned this from a memo by the Tallinn Legal Service.

Esmaspäeval juhtus segadus. Linn saatis esmalt teate, et tellitakse . Hiljem öeldi, et sellist otsust pole tehtud. Varane teade nimetati vääraks.
EN

On Monday, there was confusion. The city initially sent a notice stating that new location conditions would be ordered. Later, it was said that no such decision had been made. The early notice was deemed incorrect.

Õigusteenistus uuris . Nad ütlesid, et ei võta seisukohta, kas juurdeehitus on hea või halb. See tuleb otsustada hiljem.
EN

The Legal Service examined the planning of the New Market area. They stated that they do not take a position on whether the extension is good or bad. This will have to be decided later.

Estonia teater esitas 22. juunil uue saali ehitamise tingimused. 21. augustil jättis muinsuskaitse osakond need kinnitamata. Põhjus: need .
EN

The Estonia Theatre submitted conditions for building a new hall on 22 June. On 21 August, the heritage conservation department left these unapproved. The reason: they do not protect the historical value of the area.

Õigusteenistus leidis, et ametil polnud õigust keelduda. Kui ametnik teeb otsuse , on see viga. Kuid see ei tee otsust .
EN

The Legal Service found that the department did not have the right to refuse. If an official makes a decision without authority, it is an error. However, this does not make the decision contrary to law.

Estonia võib minna kohtusse. Kohus saab . Või Estonia saab esitada uued, paremad tingimused.
EN

The Estonia Theatre may go to court. The court can compel the department to decide again. Or Estonia can submit new, better conditions.

Õigusteenistus leidis, et ametil olid head põhjused keelduda. Kuid keeld ei tähenda, et juurdeehitus on alati võimatu. Tuleb uurida iga lahendust eraldi.
EN

The Legal Service found that the department had good reasons to refuse. However, the refusal does not mean that the extension is always impossible. Each solution must be examined separately.

Amet ütles, et uus ehitis . See muudaks Estonia ja Draamateatri vaadet. See võib kahjustada maa all olevaid vanu müüre. See vähendaks Tammsaare parki.
EN

The department stated that the new construction would damage the historical building. It would change the view between Estonia and the Drama Theatre. It could damage old walls underground. It would reduce Tammsaare Park.

Amet lisas, et Uus turg on oluline ajalooline koht. UNESCO ütles, et suur uus ehitis ei sobi sellesse kohta.
EN

The department added that the New Market is an important historical site. UNESCO said that a large new building does not fit in this location.

Estonia teatri seisukohad on erinevad. Nad ütlevad, et . . Ehitamine on võimalik.
EN

The positions of the Estonia Theatre are different. They say that protecting the rear facade is not mandatory. UNESCO opinions are not legal prohibitions. Construction is possible.

Õigusteenistus ütleb: keeld oli õige, kuid see ei tähenda, et juurdeehitus on alati võimatu. Iga lahendus tuleb uurida eraldi.
EN

The Legal Service says: the refusal was correct, but it does not mean that the extension is always impossible. Each solution must be examined separately.