The Supreme Court says that the Prosecutor's Office made a mistake.
The Prosecutor's Office did not initiate an investigation. The Prosecutor's Office stated that there was insufficient evidence.
People filed a complaint. In the complaint, it was said that a Pihlakodu employee acted wrongly.
The Supreme Court says that the victim can appeal the decision. The victim is the one who suffered damage.
The Supreme Court says that the Prosecutor's Office made significant mistakes. The court stated that there would have been enough data.
The Prosecutor's Office received a lot of information. For example, the care home management was aware of the problem.
The Supreme Court says that a complaint alone is not enough. But there was enough data for an investigation.
The prosecutor must assess the legality of the decision.