In August 2023, Tarmo Tamm filed a complaint with the court. He wanted Äripäev to state that the things written about him were incorrect. He also sought compensation for damages.
Tamm was angry because Äripäev wrote five articles about him. The articles claimed that Tamm was dishonest and untrustworthy. It was also written that his logging activities were illegal and that his floating sauna was problematic.
Tamm believed these claims were untrue. He said the articles damaged his reputation. However, the court did not agree with him.
In March 2024, Harju County Court ruled that Äripäev did nothing wrong. The court stated that the articles were interesting and based on facts. Äripäev did not say Tamm was guilty but only wrote about the investigation.
The court also found that the word "leader" was an opinion, not a fact. Therefore, it could not be disputed in court. The court said the press has the right to criticize public figures.
In summary, the court dismissed Tamm's claims. Tamm can now appeal to the circuit court. He said he would likely do so.
Tamm is disappointed with the court's decision. He believes it shows that the press does not have to take responsibility for its words. He said the decision is bad for society.